254
254
Dec 23, 2012
12/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 254
favorite 0
quote 0
more than a pat down allowed by the law. terry versus ohio you are allowed to pat down if you believe there is contraband but this was egregious. it was done on a public highway in front of motorists driving by and another family member. >> gregg: that is the part i don't get. we're not talking about a gun, a dangerous instrument. at best we're talking about a small marijuana cigarette, what happened here justify it? >> i think it could. let me say why. vicky lays out the law but here is what going to argue. police have a right to detect and deter criminality. number two, what do people, they secrete things, they hide things. i have to build up my argument. more over than that, what happens here the stop number one was predicated upon probable cause. it was something they saw that was thrown out the window. then they smell marijuana. so the officer would be justified to attempt to find that marijuana. finally, what what would be saying if they pulled out a bag of marijuana or something else. we would be arguing something far
more than a pat down allowed by the law. terry versus ohio you are allowed to pat down if you believe there is contraband but this was egregious. it was done on a public highway in front of motorists driving by and another family member. >> gregg: that is the part i don't get. we're not talking about a gun, a dangerous instrument. at best we're talking about a small marijuana cigarette, what happened here justify it? >> i think it could. let me say why. vicky lays out the law but...
152
152
Dec 23, 2012
12/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 152
favorite 0
quote 0
as my understanding of the law is, you know, essentially the administration has broken the law by not making those reports. >> that's right. you are seeing time and again this administration is simply disregarding the rule of law in one issue after another. and frankly, they are not being held to account by the legislative body on this. and when they need to say something to satisfy the critics they just make it up. for example, the religious freedom regulation in there. they simply announce there had been an accord and compromise reached when it was never reached and they simply moved on from there and said it was all about contraception and it never was. so the regulation against religious freedom continues. >> brent bodell we know you are watching those regulations and we are as well. thanks for your time. >> thank you, shannon. >>> some say no deal is what the country really needs to cut spending and raise more taxes. others predicting that the lack of an agreement will plunge the economy into an immediate recession in january should that happen. up next, a fair and balanced debat
as my understanding of the law is, you know, essentially the administration has broken the law by not making those reports. >> that's right. you are seeing time and again this administration is simply disregarding the rule of law in one issue after another. and frankly, they are not being held to account by the legislative body on this. and when they need to say something to satisfy the critics they just make it up. for example, the religious freedom regulation in there. they simply...
191
191
Dec 22, 2012
12/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 191
favorite 0
quote 0
how far do these laws need to go or should go, according to the americans that you polled? >> you first have to understand, people when they are recovering from this, they are feeling terrible for the families involved and want something done. most voters, 55%, do want to see a ban on assault weapons. they are not convinced that we'll solve the problem at all but, at least, it is a first step and also, by the way, want to see stricter steps taken with people who were diagnosed with mental illnesses and want to see something done about violence in movies and video games, right now, public opinion says something has to be done, all of our hearts say we never want to hear about this again. >> gregg: absolutely, there are a great many nations in the world who don't have the 2nd amendment or equivalent and restrict the possession and ownership and use of firearms to police and the military. how do folks in america feel about that notion? >> that doesn't fit well in the u.s. at all. only one out of four people believe it will be good if only government officials like police and m
how far do these laws need to go or should go, according to the americans that you polled? >> you first have to understand, people when they are recovering from this, they are feeling terrible for the families involved and want something done. most voters, 55%, do want to see a ban on assault weapons. they are not convinced that we'll solve the problem at all but, at least, it is a first step and also, by the way, want to see stricter steps taken with people who were diagnosed with mental...
242
242
Dec 25, 2012
12/12
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 242
favorite 0
quote 0
they go up as a matter of law. and i believe then he can talk about spending with a thank you congress in january. so i believe that the president is not ernest in trying to make a deal because if he was, a deal would have been had long ago. kelly: but, when you say that, that he is not ernest, one would argue that the republicans have not been ernest either. you have congressman boehner, house speaker, going to make a deal and having recalcitrant republicans on the other side saying we don't like this deal and go back for something else. so we come up with a plan b that fails. and now the president says we'll take a christmas break. everybody drink some eggnog, sing some christmas cheer, get with your families and come back and realize something has to be done. doesn't sound like to me wants to really see a fiscal cliff happen. >> the problem is, go ahead. >> i think he is being realistic. he put a lot on the table including cuts to social security that people in his own party are staunchly against. he has put a l
they go up as a matter of law. and i believe then he can talk about spending with a thank you congress in january. so i believe that the president is not ernest in trying to make a deal because if he was, a deal would have been had long ago. kelly: but, when you say that, that he is not ernest, one would argue that the republicans have not been ernest either. you have congressman boehner, house speaker, going to make a deal and having recalcitrant republicans on the other side saying we don't...